BERLIN (MEMO) – Palestinian journalist, Farah Maraqa, has won an unfair dismissal case against Deutsche Welle (DW) seven months after being suspended by the German media network over allegation of anti-Semitism. A German court ruled on Tuesday that her dismissal on charges of anti-Semitism was “legally unjustified” after the initial hearing on 20 July 2022. The court has ordered DW to reinstate Maraqa and pay for the costs of the legal dispute.
Maraqa was dismissed along with six other journalists in February 2022. The highly dubious and controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism was used to defend their dismissal. The charge of anti-Semitism was made against Maraqa after an external inquiry that scoured previous articles and social media posts of the former employees, who are all Palestinian or Lebanese.
The findings of the internal investigation were based on the IHRA. Pro-Zionist groups like the Canary Mission are known to keep a blacklist of people who they target using malicious allegations of anti-Semitism. It’s not known if DW used a similar anti-Palestine organization in Germany when it carried out its external inquiry.
Critics have long warned against the IHRA’s adoption. Though the so-called working definition of anti-Semitism (WDA) is non-statutory, pro-Zionist groups have counted on its mass adoption by public bodies as well as private groups to suppress criticism of the Zionist regime. Eleven of the 13 examples conflate criticism of the occupying with anti-Semitism. This latest victory is another indication that on the rare occasion the IHRA is challenged in court, victims stand a good chance of winning.
The legal victory, according to the European Legal Support Center (ELSC) which supported Maraqa’s case, suggests that the court recognized that the termination of her contract, justified through a controversial investigation using allegations of anti-Semitism based on the IHRA, was illegal.
“It is a relief that the judge ruled in Farah’s favor and held Deutsche Welle accountable for this illegal dismissal,” said Giovanni Fassina, director of the ELSC. “We hope this sends a clear message that they should stop their censorship practices.”
Warning against IHRA, Fassina added: “This case illustrates how the institutionalization of the IHRA-WDA can lead to severe infringements upon freedom of expression and freedom of the press. At the same time, it is another confirmation that pushing back – including through legal action – is effective and is a necessity in order to uphold these rights.”