Italian Court Tells RAI TV:

‘Jerusalem is Not Capital of Israel’

Date: 09 August 2020 - 21:57

News ID: ۸۱۵۳۵

ROME (Dispatches) –  Flavio Insinna, host of the popular Italian TV show "L’Eredità” will have to deliver this statement next time he goes on the air: "International law does not recognize Jerusalem (al-Quds) as the capital of the of Israel.”
This official order has been dictated by the Rome Court (Tribunale di Roma) which, on August 5, ruled in favor of two Italian pro-Palestine organizations against Italian national public broadcasting company RAI, according to The Palestine Chronicle.
The story goes back to May 21, when a TV game show contestant was asked what the ‘capital’ of the Zionist regime is. The answer "Tel Aviv” was deemed wrong. The right answer, the contestant was told, is "Jerusalem (al-Quds).”
The incident sparked a public debate in Italy. Italian foreign policy remains consistent with international law, which does not recognize al-Quds as the so-called capital of the Zionist regime.
On June 5, the host of the show, Insinna, tried to dampen the controversy, delivering a statement that read in part that "there are different views on the issue”.
However, Italian lawyers Fausto Gianelli and Dario Rossi, representing "Associazione Palestinesi in Italia” and "Associazione benefica di solidarietà con il popolo Palestinese” respectively, decided to take the case to court.
After deliberation, judge Cecilia Pratesi conveyed the much-anticipated ruling: "The Italian State does not recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.”
It is well known that on December 21, 2017, Italy voted in favor of a UN General Assembly Resolution rejecting the U.S. decision to recognize al-Quds as the so-called capital of the Zionist regime, according to the judge.
"It is also well known that the UN itself repeatedly issued its opinion, condemning the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and East Jerusalem (al-Quds), and denying any legal validity to Israel’s decision to turn Jerusalem into its capital,” she added.
"UN Resolutions”, the verdict continued, "have to be considered as conventional law, directly applicable in our legal system.”