Iranian Envoy Raps UN Dealing of Syria’s Chemical File

Date: 09 November 2022 - 21:49

News ID: ۱۰۸۸۱۹

TEHRAN -- Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations has blasted the UN Security Council for holding meetings on Syria’s chemical weapons file repeatedly, despite the country’s full cooperation with the world body, saying such a trend may prove the political nature of such meetings.
Addressing a Security Council meeting, titled “The situation in the Middle East: (Syria – Chemical),” Amir Saeed Iravani said the previous such session was held on October 25, “and we now have another meeting today only after less than two weeks, during which no new development has happened.
“Therefore, it is clear that there is no new point for today’s discussion other than the repetition of claims against the Syrian Arab Republic,” the envoy said.
He renewed the call for any investigation into the use of chemical weapons must be impartial, professional, credible, and objective, and in full compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention.
“While the Syrian Arab Republic has met the requirements of the Convention and continues to cooperate constructively with the OPCW (the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons), handling this file in a political and double-standard manner will only divert discussions away from their technical nature,” he said.
The Iranian diplomat stressed that the politicization of the provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention and the exploitation of the OPCW for political purposes threaten the credibility of the organization and the convention.
Underlining that Syria voluntarily acceded to the Chemical Weapons Convention in 2013,

Iravani said, “We believe that the collaboration of the Syrian Arab Republic with the OPCW should be recognized.”

Bassam Sabbagh, Syria’s permanent representative to the UN, said in March that the United States was seeking to discredit his country and exert political pressure on the Damascus government by manipulating reports compiled by the OPCW.

Reiterating his country’s vehement opposition to the use of chemical weapons under any circumstance, Sabbagh told a UN Security Council meeting in New York that serious flaws in the OPCW fact-finding mission’s reports on Syria had tarnished the image of the international body.

On April 14, 2018, the U.S., Britain, and France carried out a string of airstrikes against Syria over a suspected chemical weapons attack on the city of Douma, located about 10 kilometers northeast of the capital Damascus. Washington and its allies blamed Damascus for the Douma attack, a charge the Syrian government rejected.

According to concealed OPCW documents that were revealed later, the investigators of the Douma incident had found “no evidence” of a chemical weapons attack. However, the organization censored the findings under pressure from the U.S. and its allies to conceal evidence undermining the pretext of the ensuing U.S.-led bombing of Syria.

Syria surrendered its stockpile of chemical weapons in 2014 to a joint mission led by the United States and the OPCW, which oversaw the destruction of the weaponry.

The Arab country has consistently denied the use of chemical weapons despite Western rhetoric.