News ID: 90497
Publish Date : 22 May 2021 - 21:59


WASHINGTON (Dispatches) -- Google has said it has no plans to update low-resolution imagery of Occupied Palestine, the occupied Palestinian territories and the besieged Gaza Strip, despite a U.S. law that banned the use of high-quality images being lifted last year.
Prior to agreeing to a ceasefire early on Friday, the occupying regime of Israel bombed Gaza for 11 days, martyring at least 248 Palestinians, including 66 children, 39 women and 17 elderly men.
The airstrikes damaged schools, power lines, water, sanitation and sewage systems for hundreds of thousands of people in a territory that has been under blockade by the Zionist regime and Egypt for more than a decade.
Conflict researchers told Middle East Eye it would be difficult to understand the true damage caused by Israeli airstrikes due to many open source mapping tools - including Google, Apple, and Bing - which have failed to update their maps with high-resolution imagery.
At present, satellite imagery for Gaza is at a resolution of two meters per pixel, meaning buildings and streets show up blurry and are difficult to identify.
Aric Toler, who leads training and research efforts for the investigative journalism website Bellingcat, said that in order to verify or analyze a photo or video that shows a destroyed building in Gaza on Google Maps, he would “have to rely on either getting really lucky with the angle / content of a blurry satellite image” or find another way altogether.
“It’s very hard to make out objects with the existing imagery on free mapping services,” he told MEE.
Other areas around the world, including the North Korean capital Pyongyang, are detailed enough to see people walking on the streets.
Google said that it considers “opportunities to refresh our satellite imagery as higher resolution imagery becomes available”, but that it has “no plans to share at this time”.
Meanwhile, Apple told BBC that it was working to update its maps soon to a higher resolution. Microsoft, the parent company of Bing, appears to be displaying lower-resolution imagery as well. Microsoft did not respond to MEE’s request for comment.
The original reasoning behind the low-resolution satellite imagery of Occupied Palestine and the occupied Palestinian territories comes from a 1997 amendment to the U.S. national defense authorization act.
The Kyl-Bingaman Amendment restricted the use of satellite imagery in Occupied Palestine and Gaza to two meters per pixel, citing security concerns at the time. However, last year the amendment was revised to allow for greater resolution of the area.
According to Google, “satellite imagery in Google Maps and Earth is built from a broad range of providers, including public, government, commercial and private sector sources”.
Yet one of those companies, Maxar Technologies - which is shown as a source of its map data for Gaza as of 2021 - offers much higher resolution images than Google utilizes.
High-resolution satellite imagery is an important tool for researchers, investigative journalists, and human rights groups to track what is taking place during a conflict.
Such imagery has been used to show the destruction of more than 200 Rohingya villages by the Myanmar military in 2017, as well as to report on a network of centers set up for the Uyghurs across the Xinjiang region in China.
Still, when it comes to the issue of Israeli airstrikes on the Gaza Strip, researchers have had to rely on paid satellite imagery, such as Maxar, or find other ways of confirming what buildings or areas were bombed.
Marwa Fatafta, a policy analyst at the Palestinian policy network Al-Shabaka, said the decision was not surprising, considering that Google is “lending its cloud service to the Israeli regime & their military apparatus”.
Earlier this year, Google, alongside Amazon Web Services, was awarded a $1.2bn offer to provide cloud services to Zionist agencies.
The tech giant has also been accused of violating international law by recognizing illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, according to the Arab Center for Social Media Advancement, 7amleh.

* Comment: