EU Sparks Fears of Militarism With Budget for Weapons
BRUSSELS (Dispatches) -- The European Parliament’s approval of a 7.9-billion-euro military budget has generated protest from some lawmakers who are worried about the bloc’s growing militarism.
The massive funding that is equivalent to $9.5 billion is intended to improve European military might over the next seven years by supporting joint research and development projects with up to eight percent of it dedicated to what is described as new "disruptive technologies”.
"We must increasingly be able to take our own security into our own hands, and to be a security player on the world stage,” EU internal market commissioner Thierry Breton told the European Parliament. "The European Defense Fund is an essential building block in increasing independence for Europe.”
Discussions have raged for decades over the sort of role Brussels should presume on defense. EU member nations -- most of which are also members of the U.S.-led NATO military alliance -- have persistently been reluctant to agree on efforts to integrate military capabilities.
France has spearheaded a push for EU "strategic autonomy,” insisting that the coronavirus pandemic, a resurgent Russia and former U.S. president Donald Trump’s threats to cut off allies demonstrated that Europe had to be able to stand alone.
Some lawmakers opposed to the move accused the European Parliament of voting for militarism over common sense.
Independent Socialist MEP from Dublin Clare Daly slammed the vote on her Facebook page, saying: "Today the European Parliament had its last chance - with our group’s rejection amendment for the European Defense Fund - to say NO to crossing the line and dumping €8 billion of public funds into weapons spending.”
"Sadly this morning it voted for militarism over common sense, 697 to 139,” she added. "In writing this check for the European Defense Fund, the parliament has put in place the cornerstone for an EU military industrial complex.”
"A union founded on an ideal of peace signing off for the first time on a slush fund of €8 billion for merchants of slaughter,” Clare further wrote, asking, "What now for Irish neutrality?”
The European Parliament’s point man on the fund, Zdzislaw Krasnodebski, sought to reject "urban legends” that the new program set the bloc on the path to a united military.
The massive funding that is equivalent to $9.5 billion is intended to improve European military might over the next seven years by supporting joint research and development projects with up to eight percent of it dedicated to what is described as new "disruptive technologies”.
"We must increasingly be able to take our own security into our own hands, and to be a security player on the world stage,” EU internal market commissioner Thierry Breton told the European Parliament. "The European Defense Fund is an essential building block in increasing independence for Europe.”
Discussions have raged for decades over the sort of role Brussels should presume on defense. EU member nations -- most of which are also members of the U.S.-led NATO military alliance -- have persistently been reluctant to agree on efforts to integrate military capabilities.
France has spearheaded a push for EU "strategic autonomy,” insisting that the coronavirus pandemic, a resurgent Russia and former U.S. president Donald Trump’s threats to cut off allies demonstrated that Europe had to be able to stand alone.
Some lawmakers opposed to the move accused the European Parliament of voting for militarism over common sense.
Independent Socialist MEP from Dublin Clare Daly slammed the vote on her Facebook page, saying: "Today the European Parliament had its last chance - with our group’s rejection amendment for the European Defense Fund - to say NO to crossing the line and dumping €8 billion of public funds into weapons spending.”
"Sadly this morning it voted for militarism over common sense, 697 to 139,” she added. "In writing this check for the European Defense Fund, the parliament has put in place the cornerstone for an EU military industrial complex.”
"A union founded on an ideal of peace signing off for the first time on a slush fund of €8 billion for merchants of slaughter,” Clare further wrote, asking, "What now for Irish neutrality?”
The European Parliament’s point man on the fund, Zdzislaw Krasnodebski, sought to reject "urban legends” that the new program set the bloc on the path to a united military.