Israel Covers $500,000 Per Month in Replacement Rents  

TEL AVIV (Dispatches) -- Five months after Iran’s precision strike on Tel Aviv’s iconic Da Vinci Towers, Israel continues to grapple with the fallout, exposing the fragility of its security claims and the enormous cost of its military adventurism. 
The northern tower, which sustained a direct hit, remains uninhabitable, with rehabilitation work stalled and residents forced into regime-funded alternative accommodations for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, the southern tower, though cleared for habitation, is overshadowed by the looming repair needs of its twin.
According to the Israeli business outlet Globes, the total cost of providing temporary housing for the residents of the northern Da Vinci Tower alone amounts to nearly NIS 500,000 per month ($185,000 USD), or $1.85–2.2 million annually. 
The most luxurious apartments, including penthouses, cost the Zionist regime up to NIS 70,000 per month ($25,900 USD) each in replacement rent—a staggering financial burden. On top of that, tens of millions of shekels (equivalent to several million USD) are projected to repair structural, electrical, water, and communications damage, as engineers stress the northern tower’s skeleton and core infrastructure were critically compromised.
The damage extends beyond Tel Aviv. In Ramat Gan, residents of the Elite Tower, also targeted in the June strikes, remain displaced, with the regime covering an estimated $925,000 annually in alternative housing costs. The scale of Israel’s financial liability highlights not only the physical vulnerability of its urban centers but also the crippling economic impact of its confrontation with Iran.
The strikes represent a stark reminder that Iran possesses the 
strategic depth to retaliate in ways Israel cannot easily neutralize. While Tel Aviv boasts of its military prowess and technological edge, the missile attacks revealed serious gaps in the illegal entity’s air defense and crisis response mechanisms. 
More importantly, the Israeli regime now bears the public and private cost of its own policies, funding expensive temporary accommodations for displaced settlers and facing logistical and legal disputes over building permits and reconstruction timelines.
Compounding the issue, the northern tower’s repair is delayed by bureaucratic hurdles, as municipal authorities insist on formal permits for major rehabilitation work, while residents demand immediate action. 
This bureaucratic friction, coupled with the extensive engineering and structural damage, underscores how far-reaching Iran’s retaliation has been—impacting Israel economically, politically, and socially.
Even Israel’s real estate market, long considered a symbol of its urban resilience and wealth, has been rattled. Luxury apartments in the Da Vinci Towers, some valued at over $5 million, are now tied up in a web of temporary housing costs, stalled sales, and investor uncertainty. 
Apartments that were part of regime-subsidized rental programs have seen dramatic price cuts—almost 60% in some cases—demonstrating the broader economic reverberations of the strikes.
The Iranian missile campaign thus delivered more than just military impact; it exposed vulnerabilities in Israel’s urban planning, fiscal priorities, and civilian infrastructure protection. The illegal entity, which often positions itself as the unassailable power in the region, now finds itself paying for the settlers’ displacement while facing mounting criticism over delays in reconstruction and the sheer scale of repair costs.
What is clear is that Iran’s strikes were not symbolic gestures—they were calculated, precise, and strategically disruptive. 
For Israel, the ongoing economic and infrastructural fallout from the Da Vinci and Elite Towers is a humbling reminder that its regional aggressions come with direct consequences. The narrative of invulnerability has been shattered, replaced with a costly reality in which the state must confront the very vulnerabilities it long denied.
In short, Iran has turned its retaliation into a strategic masterstroke: inflicting measurable economic strain, highlighting security failures, and undermining Israel’s domestic and international narrative of control. 
As the months stretch on and residents remain displaced, Israel’s leadership faces a question that cannot be answered with rhetoric alone: how does an entity that prides itself on military dominance reconcile with the tangible, disruptive consequences of its adversary’s retaliation?